Warner Bros.
in ,

Film Review: ‘Wonka’ Has Too Much Going On and Not Enough to Chew On

TIMOTHÉE CHALAMET as Willy Wonka in Warner Bros. Pictures and Village Roadshow Pictures’ “WONKA,” a Warner Bros. Pictures release. Photo by Jaap Buittendijk

My mother loved Willy Wonka & the Chocolate Factory. Without question, it was among her five favorite movies of all-time (alongside the likes of The Wizard of Oz as well as the original Yours, Mine and Ours). I say this, especially this year, to illustrate how much of an easy mark I should be for this film. A prequel to one of my late mom’s favorites? Something that harkens back to my youth. Yeah, it’s a pretty firm match. And yet, all year I’ve been, at best, indifferent to Wonka. So, I went in with low expectations, potentially setting myself up for a surprise. Well, there was a surprise, mostly in that Wonka is a sometimes befuddling, often meandering, and even more disappointing work than I’d expected.

Wonka has a solid leading man, the occasional catchy song, and plenty of callbacks to the original, some of which are even amusing. However, it also has a bloated running time, some odd tonal shifts, and a distinct sense of trying too hard. There’s always a lot going on here, but not a whole lot that’s actually happening. Alas, at least it’s still way better than Charlie and the Chocolate Factory.

Warner Bros.

This is an origin story for Willy Wonka (Timothée Chalamet), well before he’d open up his chocolate factory. When we meet young Willy, he’s on a steamer headed to a French city with big dreams. He wants to open up a shop to see his special treats, driven to make them by an undying love for his dearly departed mother (Sally Hawkins). Poor, young, and a bit naive, he’s immediately taken advantage of, due to the very strange fact that he can’t read. Deeply in debt to Mrs. Scrubitt (Olivia Colman) after he doesn’t read the fine print on the contract he signed while staying at her in, Willy befriends the others in the same boat, including Noodle (Calah Lane). In short order, he plans on escape from Mrs. Scrubitt’s clutches, in order to sell his chocolate.

Willy discovers in town that the chocolate industry is run by a cartel of greedy chocolatiers, known as the chocolate cartel. They’re led by Slugworth (Paterson Joseph), who fears Willy’s cheap and delicious candy. Hassled by the police chief (Keegan-Michael Key) and pestered by a little Oompa-Loompa (Hugh Grant), Willy will have to utilize some magic to achieve his dreams.

Warner Bros.

Timothée Chalamet certainly goes all in on the role. He’s always doing a thing, that’s for sure. He’s not ever the boring part of the film, so there’s that. If he’s trying to remind you of Gene Wilder, however, that’s a swing and a miss. Olivia Colman is chewing all the scenery she can find, while Hugh Grant is cute enough in a smaller role than you might think. The aforementioned Keegan-Michael Key and Sally Hawkins are fine but not noteworthy, while supporting players include Rowan Atkinson, Tom Davis, the aforementioned Paterson Joseph and Calah Lane, as well as many more.

Filmmaker Paul King, co-writing here with Simon Farnaby, makes the baffling choice to avoid the obvious origin story, in favor of a plot kicked into motion by illiteracy. Farnaby and King get so caught up in a bunch of things so far removed from what you’d think this film would be about that you almost wonder why they attached themselves to the property at all. An original movie musical like this might have been better, as opposed to plastering it on to Wonka. King’s direction is light enough on its feet, but the charm that so permeates his previous work for so many is only in sporadic evidence here.

Wonka did almost nothing for me. Perhaps it’ll do more for you. Children will be bored, adults may well be puzzled. Plus, go figure that this is another movie musical hiding the fact that it’s a musical. Films that do that often suffer the consequences. Here, it’s hard to say, as there are other reasons why this didn’t work for me. See it for yourself and you may agree.

SCORE: ★★

Comments

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

13 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Anonymous
Anonymous
2 years ago

You’re an idiot! If you didn’t like this movie it is because you either have never seen the original, and base your review solely on Johnny Depp or you lack all imagination possible and prove to me what is wrong with society today!

Wayne
2 years ago

You may be right
I may be crazy
Oh, but it just may be a PAST you’re looking for
Turn out the light
Don’t try to save me
You may be wrong for all I know
But you may be right .

Thank U Billy Joel for that reference. Whom is this movie for and is it/ was it entertaining?

Looking forward to finding out – Says the 63 year production guy whom can’t enjoy movies (hardly) anymore as I am too busy looking to see how they did it.

IF someone is still reading – I have no problem flying and bending steel with your bare hands but you can’t drive across town in 5 minutes. GEEZ.. THANKS FOR THE REVIEW. !

Anonymous
Anonymous
2 years ago

Moron

Tony Saccaro
Tony Saccaro
2 years ago

Wow! I’m completely astonished by your inept review of Wonka!! This a very delightful and heartwarming story that is nostalgic and new at the same time! It’s like one of the chocolates from the movie itself, it takes you by complete amazement, wonder and a wonderful journey! The musical score is incredibly heart-warming, full of toe-tapping enjoyment and ties in the right amount of nostalgic ties to the original and is just like a Wonka scrumdiddlyumptious bar, itself!!! Timothee Chalamet does not try to do Gene Wilder as that was not even his aim! He places his own incredible spin on the character, while preserving the magic and whimsy of Willy Wonka!!! I love Gene Wilder and enjoyed the original; Gene put his own spin on it! Wonka takes the story on a different scale and in many ways is a better movie! The story is very interesting and different, yet wonderfully enjoyable, to follow and does not have any befuddlement, as you say! The only befuddlement is whether or not you actually attended this movie or like Slugworth, himself, you just didn’t want Wonka to succeed!! I believe you were the only one bored and puzzled as you truly did not experience this movie, but just unwilling attended had a preconceived review already made up, that’s why it did nothing for you!

Lynda
Lynda
2 years ago

Totally agree, what a terrible movie ! Story line was absolutely ridiculous!

Ana
Ana
2 years ago

I stumbled on this review while searching why Wonka did not get nominated for the Oscars. I now understand why movies that get Oscar nominations have become so boring as of late. It’s because of people like this who don’t appreciate a good movie and instead want something else that they can’t even describe!

Anonymous
Anonymous
2 years ago

I have really been looking forward this movie and finally watched it this evening. The film was not what I expected and left me sad. The writers had a real opportunity to make something special, but squandered it on a sloppy musical with a very thin story. I also didn’t think it was possible to make a movie too fantastical, yet here we are. The movie focused so much on CGI, but not so much on how the characters got there, so it felt more like show-and-tell for the graphics team and less like an origin story. I grew up with the original and it was magical. Unfortunately, Wonka had magic, but it was not magical.

Loading…

0

Written by Joey Magidson

The Winners Of The 50th Annual Daytime Emmy® Awards – Creative Arts & Lifestyle Ceremony 

Interview: Chatting About the Wild Madness of ‘Poor Things’ with Writer Tony McNamara